Death by Vaccination: The Gates Foundation and the New Eugenics
September 22, 2010
Gary Null
Richard Gale & Gary Null
September 22, 2010
http://www.garynull.com/home/death-by-vaccination-the-gates-foundation-and-the-new-eugeni-1.html
While lecturing at the elitist TED 2010 conference in Long Beach,
CA, Bill Gates slipped a statement while speaking on the dangers of
climate change and over population: “Vaccines? I love them.” His
admission was made in the context of his philanthropic strategy and, as
we will see, vaccines play a dominant role in his firm conviction that
population reduction is an urgent priority for the survival of
humanity. Then the question is, who should be eliminated from the
population? Who is elected from the public to make such decisions? The
short answer is no one. Hence it is being done quietly thru
foundations, international agencies and private industry.
Today the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is “the most powerful
charity in the world, and one of the most quietly influential
international organizations of any sort.”[1] The Foundation is funded
to the tune of $34.6 billion plus an additional $30 billion from
Warren Buffet’s investments. This is almost the entire budget of the
World Health Organization (WHO).
Gates has followed in the footsteps of the Rockefellers’ lead to
usher the New Green Revolution, an aggressive onslaught of genetically
modified seeds (GMOs) to increase large scale corporate-influenced
agriculture in Africa, India and elsewhere. The international GMO
initiatives have devastated small cooperative farms that have served as
the lifeline of food for centuries and as resulted in the deaths of
hundreds of thousands of farmers. Of course nobody among the oligarchic
elite, such as Gates, Rockefeller and Monsanto execs, will suffer from
the consequences of this failed revolution.
However, it is vaccine research and development targeting
Africa primarily, but also other developing nations, that holds center
stage in his Foundation’s strategic funding. During the recent 2010
World Economic Forum, Gates announced he would spend $10 billion over
the next ten years on child vaccine development for poorer nations.[2].
While calling this admirable might appear to be an understatement,
which vaccines and which channels of funding rquire scrutiny in order
to assess the value and motives of the Foundation’s mission.
In 2000, the Gates Foundation founded the International Finance
Facility for Immunization (GAVI) and that organization’s Global Fund
for Children’s Vaccines. GAVI is a global collaboration that includes
governments, the Rockefeller Foundation, the World Bank, WHO, the
International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers, UNICEF,
vaccine makers, and other influential entities. All of these are zealot
vaccination promoters. The organization’s mission is to vaccinate every
child in Africa. Through GAVI and its various programs, an estimated
250 million children in developing countries have already been
vaccinated.[3] But the Foundation itself does not perform drug
and vaccine research and development. In addition to traditional grant
giving, it also provides lines of credit. For example, the
International AIDS Vaccine Initiative received from the Foundation a
$100 million line of credit to empower the nonprofit organization to
influence HIV vaccine development within the vaccine industrial
complex.[4]
Over the past several years, evidence is accumulating over Gates’
and his Foundations’ duplicity in saying one thing and acting
otherwise. For example, frequently Gates has stated his opposition to
Big Tobacco and claims he refuses to invest or fund any organization
and company contributing to smoking. However, a recent investigation
showed that the Foundation has in fact invested in Big Tobacco for
quite some time.[5] Similarly, behind his verbiage on tackling climate
change and shifting to non-fossil fuel technologies at the TED
conference, Gates remains a heavy investor in Big Oil, particularly
Exxon-Mobile and British Petroleum—perhaps the two oil companies the
most corrupt history in recent decades.[6]
We appear, therefore, to be faced with a serious uncertainty over
the public image of the very likable, mild-manner Bill Gates, who
expresses repeatedly his ambition to improve the health of the
developing world, and then the possibility of other ulterior motives
that are contrary to saving lives. Should we take Gates and his
Foundation’s word that their primary objective is to improve the health
and well-being of children in poorer nations by fighting disease and
illness with vaccines? Or is his vaccine agenda another ruse with a
more sinister agenda? For example, it is hard to imagine that Gates is
unaware that his commitment to the Green Revolution is in point of fact
a Green Disaster and that no GMO has lived up to its promise. Yet he
simply continues his enormous funding of agricultural genetic
manipulation projects. Therefore, we believe there is sound reason that
his Foundation’s many international vaccine initiatives represent much
more than excessively kind-hearted charity.
Over the past several years, the prestigious British medical journal
The Lancet has printed a series of in-depth analyses of the Gates
Foundation with disturbing revelations. In a September 2008 article,
“Misfinancing Global Health: A Case for Transparency in Disbursements
and Decision Making,” the authors’ investigation came to the conclusion
that aside from excessive funding of high profile Western institutions
and organizations, there was “a heavy bias in funding towards malaria
and HIV/AIDS, with relatively little investment into tuberculosis,
maternal and child health, and nutrition--with chronic diseases being
entirely absent from its spending portfolio.”[7] And a later study by
Dr. David McCoy from the Center for International Health found that
“the grants made by the Foundation do not reflect the burden of disease
endured by those in deepest poverty.”[8] None of these findings have
been covered to any extent by mainstream media nor any governing body.
No one can doubt Gates’ intellectual genius and talent/ Neither are
we questioning his philanthropic endeavors that exceeds that of any
other human being. So, then, why is his Foundation spending such
wealth unwisely, and why is it ignoring far more effective and less
costly solutions and practices for relieving the suffering of millions
of children, women and men throughout the developing world.
In his deconstruction of Bill Gates’ charitable agenda, F. William
Engdahl writes, “Vaccinating a child who then goes to drink
feces-polluted river water is hardly healthy in any respect. But of
course cleaning up the water and sewage systems of Africa would
revolutionize the health conditions of the Continent.”[9] Far
more effective would be the Foundation donating its billions to improve
sanitation and hygiene, and provide nutrition to the 2.6 billion people
who have none, for increasing clean water sources so 900 million global
residents can have access to drinkable water (now at 1 in 3 Africans).
Instead, the Foundation could be funding thousands of health clinics
focusing on the chronic illnesses these populations suffer from
most.[10] This is simply common sense. “Bad water,” says the
Stockholm International Water Institute’s director, Anders Bentell,
“kills more people than HIV, malaria and war together.”[11]
Spending billions of dollars to develop new vaccines and launch
monumental efforts to vaccinate African children plagued with
diverse infectious illnesses promises to be a fruitless enterprise
while these populations continue to live in squalor. After
decades of mass vaccination programs across Africa, current vaccines
have neither proven their medical effectiveness and safety nor their
ability to truly enhance the quality of life of impoverished Africans.
Instead, as part of its Millennium Development Goal, the Foundation
prefers to make its Rotavirus Vaccine Program to battle diarrheal
diseases one of its two major focuses (in partnership with PATH, the
WHO and the CDC).[12] The FDA has already announced warnings of
Rotavirus vaccine’ life threatening adverse effects, such as
intessusception or the severe twisting of children’s intestines that
can lead to death.[13] Children in developing countries, already
suffering from extreme immune-deficiencies due to malnutrition, lack of
sanitary living conditions, and local diseases only have their bodies
further weakened after any vaccination.
As a keynote speaker at the TED 2010 conference, Gates laid out his
rationale for an international effort towards global
depopulation. He said, “If we do a really great job on new
vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower
that [projected to 9 billion people by 2050] by perhaps 10 or 15
percent.“ New vaccines for depopulation? What Gates might
be referring to by “new vaccines” is the creation of new generation
sterilizing and/or aborting vaccines with an ingredient or genetically
engineered component that can go undetected. Vaccines to prevent
pregnancy already exist; in fact, they have been with us for a long
time. One area of vaccine research the Gates’ Foundation is funding in
its Grand Challenges Explorations is the use of nano-particles.[14]
Such engineered vaccines, with no gold standard for long term safety
and efficacy, could virtually go undetected without highly advanced and
expensive technologies to identify their presence.
As early as 1968, the Rockefeller Foundation’s annual report
recommended anti-fertility vaccines as a viable means for lessening the
human population growth rate that should be aggressively pursued.
The quandary lies in an ethical, moral and transparent means, which
honor the free choice of the individual, for reducing the global birth
rate. Unfortunately, past history shows that previous attempts to
inoculate communities with anti-fertility vaccines have not only been
unethical but covert and criminal. And when one thinks about it, what
better way to lessen population growth, in addition to reducing years
of life-expectancy, than through family planning vaccination programs
spearheaded by government mandated international finance and health
organizations, such as the World Bank, UNDP and WHO, and by willing
governments and billionaires who are happy to help fund eugenic
efforts? In addition, there are many powerful non-profit
organizations, such as Save the Children and US Aid, who benefit
handsomely from these multilateral institutions and rely upon their
funding to carry out their demands.
An early anti-fertility trial using human chorionic gonadotrophin
(hCG), a hormone essential for pregnancy, in vaccines was completed in
1988 in India through a Rockefeller collaboration with India’s National
Institute of Immunology. The Rockefeller annual report declared
success. Yet according to Betsy Hartman, Director of Hampshire
College’s Population and Development Program, “although one vaccine has
been tested on only 180 women in India, it is being billed there as
safe, devoid of any side effects and completely reversible.”[15]
Perhaps the most thorough documented investigation into the covert
use of anti-fertility vaccines is a 1995 report, “Are New Vaccines
Laced with Birth Control Drugs,” compiled by J.A. Miller, a
correspondent for the pro-life missionary movement Human Life
International. In the early 1990s, the WHO, supported by the
Rockefeller Foundation, the World Bank, the UN Development Programme,
and the US’s National Institutes of Health undertook stealth
anti-fertility initiatives under the disguise of tetanus vaccination
programs. These vaccines were administered to unsuspecting and poor
communities in Mexico, Nicaragua and the Philippines.[16]
The tetanus vaccines, manufactured by Connaught and Intervex in
Canada, and CSL, Ltd in Australia (a leading maker of the H1N1 flu
vaccine that has been implicated in statistically significant numbers
of seizures and heavily supported by the Rupert Murdoch family) were
laced with hCG.[17] Scientists working on the project discovered that
the tetanus vaccine was an ideal vehicle for introducing hCG peptides
that when injected into a woman’s body would induce hCG antibodies
thereby preventing pregnancy. In brief, a woman’s body turns on
autopilot to attack her own natural production of hCG.[18]
All would have gone well for the scheme’s masterminds if it were not
for individuals working in local religious charities having observed
some highly suspicious procedures. For example, why were only women
between the ages of 15 to 45 receiving the tetanus shot and no men? And
why were multiple booster shots required during the following months
when a single tetanus injection is well-known to provide protection for
ten years? In the Philippines, laboratory results of vaccinated woman
in almost all cases discovered the presence of hCG antibodies; lab
investigations into the vaccines uncovered the presence of hCG; and a
subsequent investigation found that none of the hCG-laced vaccine lots
had been registered with the government’s Bureau of Food and
Drugs. The episode was entirely a black op, a super human stealth
experiment preying upon poor innocent women.[19]
While the above is the best documented example, other less well
known eugenic experiments during the 1990s using anti-fertility
vaccines have been conducted in Haiti and among the Akha people in
Thailand, in poorer African-American neighborhoods in Los Angeles, and
among indigenous people in North and Latin America.
A 1995 BBC documentary, “The Human Laboratory,” interviewed Filipino
women’s activist Mary Pilar Verzosa, who reported on the vaccine’s
adverse effects. These included fertility cycles that were “all fouled
up,” spontaneous bleeding and miscarriages.[20] Seemingly, women were
not screened to determine whether or not they were pregnant before
injections. Consequently in addition to interfering with a woman’s
ability to become pregnant the WHO was launching a clandestine
experiment to observe whether the vaccine would trigger miscarriages.
No published studies exist for long-term follow up on women
receiving hCG-laced vaccines and associated severe adverse effects.
Given the WHO’s past record of seriously flawed misjudgments and
secrecy--their recent fabrication of a level-6 H1N1 pandemic being an
excellent recent example--and those of the other organizations
complicit in covert vaccine operations, we should not be surprised that
such studies exist. Because the hCG hormone is involved in many other
bodily functions besides pregnancy, it is likely that artificially
creating hCG antibodies in a woman would result in a cascade of serious
incurable health problems. The hormone plays an important role in
endocrine functioning of the brain’s hypothalamus. It is a known
diagnostic marker for certain types of tumors. Artificially
interfering in its production could potentially cause any number of
different cancers. Since hCG is essential for healthy pituitary gland
function, such toxic vaccines would interfere with this master gland’s
regulatory function of maintaining homeostatic balance, hormonal
equilibrium, throughout the body’s endocrine system. There can be an
incalculable number of adverse conditions resulting from such a vaccine.
If used with the wrong motives, vaccines can e excellent devices for
lessening lifespan. In addition, there are unanswered questions about
how safe and effective vaccines actually are. For example, a child will
not develop cancer or acquire a chronic autoimmune dysfunction a week
or two after receiving a flu or measles injection. Yet, vaccines,
especially those relying upon animal tissue to culture viruses during
the manufacturing process—the influenza, the MMR, and yellow fever
vaccines—are known to be highly contaminated with foreign animal
viruses (including Avian Leukosis Virus and Equine Arteritis Virus),
genetic fragments of such viruses, oncogenes (genes that turn normal
cells cancerous), and prions (tiny proteins responsible for incurable
diseases and neurological disorders in animals and humans). Public
awareness of this fact appeared in transcripts from private meetings of
the Center for Disease Control’s Vaccine and Related Biological
Products Advisory Committee and the Evolving Scientific and Regulatory
Perspective Workshop in 1998 and 1999 respectively and obtained by
British investigative journalist Janine Roberts.[21]
According to the committees’ participants representing, “the largest
public health institutions in the West,” it is impossible to remove DNA
contaminants from vaccines. When the question was raised whether or not
vaccine DNA contamination could cause cancer or autoimmune disease, one
respondent stated, “when you consider that almost every one of these
vaccines is injected right into the tissue... I think you couldn’t do
much more to get the DNA expressed [to get contaminating cancer-causing
DNA taken up by human cells] than to inject it into a muscle in the way
it’s being done.”[22]
Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, Chairman of the health committees in the German
Parliament and the European Council, reported that Novartis was using a
“nutrient solution” relying on cancer-cell lines in a bioreactor to
manufacture its H1N1 vaccine. He issued warnings that adverse reactions
to this kind of engineered vaccine are unknown.[23]
Bill Gates’ mission to protect poorer populations from disease
through mass vaccination, his sense of urgency that the global
population is too large and needs to be reduced, and his deep financial
and collaborative enterprises with the oligarchic elite, health
agencies and multilateral organizations with a past history of eugenic
intentions and experimentation, make for a bizarre mix that raises
serious questions about the truth behind his Foundation’s motives.
America has a long history of eugenic science through the first half
of the twentieth century--John D. Rockefeller, Margaret Sanger, Paul
Popenoe, Madison Grant and others. The names of the organizations and
facilities they founded or supported tells the story. Andrew Carnegie’s
Institute was the primary funder of the Eugenics Record Office that
operated from the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories. The Laboratory was
closed in 1944 after the public became aware of thousands
sterilizations it oversaw.
Likewise the Rockefellers were major funders of not only Cold Spring
Harbor but also the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Eugenics, which became
the center of the Nazi’s extermination experiments. The Rockefellers’
Population Council, with the mission to advance birth control, was
first headed by Frederick Osborn, a leader in the American Eugenics
Society.[24] And there is no reason to believe America’s eugenic
tradition has died out, although it has mutated into what might appear
to be a less malignant form compared to the days when over half of the
fifty states were conducting forced sterilization on poor woman and
inmates in prisons and mental institutes.
Nobody should doubt the eugenic agenda remains alive and well in
America. In fact, behind the closed corridors among the global elite,
it is gaining fuel. For these people, sacrificing poor people in the
developing world on the altar of a distorted Manifest Destiny, and
setting their own rules in modern technologies--vaccines and GMO
seeds--with the potential to destroy every unborn child is simply
racism and bigotry. Kenyon College anthropologist Ken Smail, in a 2004
World Watch article, wrote, “That there will be large scale reduction
in global human numbers over the next two or three centuries appears to
be inevitable. The primary issue seems to be whether this process will
be under conscious human control and (hopefully) relatively benign, or
whether it will turn out to be unpredictably chaotic and (perhaps)
catastrophic.”[25]
The weakness in today’s elites’ depopulation agenda is fourfold.
First it has always been the poorer, less educated segments of humanity
that should be reduced and no one else. Therefore, second, since they
cannot be allowed to have a freedom of choice or vote on the matter,
the elites must make this decision for them. Third, their argument
crumbles since it is the elites themselves that place value on one
particular life as being different than another. And finally, since
depopulation cannot be executed transparently, it must be done through
deceit and clandestine means.
So what are the lessons to be learned from this? The wealthiest
elite on the planet are rarely questioned about the correctness of
their actions and schemes. As long as one of these individuals say they
are giving huge sums of money to a cause to end disease and suffering,
we are not suppose to probe further. Rather, in the case of mainstream
media, such people are to be worshiped as saviors. The oligarchic elite
are so well interconnected on multiple boards of directors, clubs for
the rich and powerful, think tanks, and among the high ranks of elected
legislators and politicians that it is difficult to have an open and
honest debate on the merits of their actions and spending. When a Ted
Turner says we should reduce the world’s population by more than half,
and Bill Gates suggests a 15 percent reduction, do we really understand
they are following a form of eugenic genocide?
NOTES
[1] Beckett, Andy. “Inside the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.” Guardian UK. July 12, 2010.
[2] Engdahl, F. William. “Bill Gates Talks about Vaccines to Reduce Population.” Financial Sense Editorials. March 4, 2010.
[3] “Gates Foundation Decade of Vaccines.” The Lancet. March 2010. Vol. 10. No. 3. p. 39
[4] Beckett, Andy. Op cit.
[5] Schestowitz, Roy. “Gates Foundation Retreats After Being Exposed as Funder of Big Tobacco.” Techrights.org. April 19, 2010.
[6] Schestowitz, Roy. “Bill Gates Invests Heavily in Deception about
Global Warming and in Abusive Monopolies.” Techrights.org. February 22,
2010.
[7] “What has the Gates Foundation Done for Global Health,” The Lancet. Vol. 373, no. 9675. May 9, 2009
[8] Ibid.
[9] Engdahl, F. William. Op cit.
[10] Deen, Thailif. “Summit Failure on Water, Sanitation Would be Recipe for Disaster,” Commondreams.org September 14, 2010
[11] Deen, Thailif. “Time Running Out Faster than Water, Experts Warn,” IPS News. September 6, 2010
[12] GAVI Alliance. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GAVI_Alliance
[13] “New Rotavirus Vaccine Danger: FDA Warns as Possibly
Life-Threatening for your Child” Health and Wellness. February 13, 2007
[14] Butler, Byron. “Gates Foundation donates $7.8 million to global initiatives.” The Daily Tell. May 14, 2010
[15] Maessen, Jurriaan. “Rockefeller Foundation Developed Vaccines
for “Mass-Scale” Fertility Reduction.” Infowars. August 5, 2010.
[16] Miller, JA. “Are New Vaccines Laced with Birth Control Drugs?”
Human Life International Reports, Vol. 13, No. 8, June/July 1995
[17] Centers for Disease Control. “ACIP Recommendation for Use of CSL Influenza Vaccine.” CDC Press Release, August 5, 2010
[18] Miller, JA. Op cit.
[19] Ibid.
[20] Taylor, Daniel. “Vaccinate the World: Gates, Rockefeller Seek
Global Population Reduction.” Global Research. September 7, 2010.
[21] Gale, R, Null G. “Vaccines’ Dark Inferno: What is not on Insert
Labels” Global Research. September 29, 2009; also see, Roberts, Janine.
Fear of the Invisible: How Scared Should We be of Viruses and Vaccines.
Impact Investigative Media Productions: Bristol UK, 2009
[22] Ibid.
[23] “Does Virus Vaccine Increase the Risk of Cancer.” Bild.com (Germany) September 7, 2009
[24] Taylor, Daniel. “Eugenics Moves to the Twenty-First Century,” Old-Thinker News. August 27, 2007
[25] Smail, Ken. “Global Population Reduction: Confronting the Inevitable,” World Watch. September/October, 2004
